| |
Incident Response Process
A Computer Security Incident occurs when a computer system, a
network service, or data is altered, disrupted, abused, or exposed in any way
that is a violation of security policy or privacy policy. Such an
Incident may occur maliciously or by accident.
Security and Privacy Policies for the University of South Carolina are
defined in the following documents:
Below is a brief outline and flow of the 6 steps of computer
security incident response:
Step 1 – Preparation
During the preparation phase, the IT Security Office, in
conjunction with the rest of the University community, makes sure
that our designated controls (e.g., policies, standards, guidelines,
procedures, hardware controls, software controls, physical controls,
etc.) are in place and functioning. These preparatory actions will
limit the confusion, disorganization, and panic that accompanies a
typical computer security incident.
Step 2 – Identification
Identification procedures determine if a computer security
incident has actually occurred. These procedures are designed to
identify what the nature of the incident is, the extent of the
incident and any additional information needed to begin containment
of the incident. Identification usually begins when the IT Security
Office notices something odd on a computer or the network and begins
to investigate (in conjunction with other University offices), or
when the IT Security Office receives an incident notification from
an external entity.
As soon as enough verifiable information is collected, the IT
Security Office initiates communications with the owner or sponsor
of the impacted system and other University officials, as
appropriate. If, or when, it is determined that sensitive data is
involved, the appropriate data stewards and University officials are
immediately notified.
Step 3 – Containment
Containment procedures attempt to actively limit the scope and
magnitude of the attack. Any available means will be employed to
prevent further compromise of University assets, as deemed
appropriate by University officials, and in conjunction with the
affected University offices. This can include, but is not limited
to, blocking the compromised system at the network level, physically
unplugging the compromised system, or otherwise removing access to
the compromised service. Every reasonable effort will be made to
coordinate containment efforts with the system owner or sponsor, as
well as affected customers.
Step 4 – Eradication
This is the step where the IT Security Office, in conjunction
with other University offices, will try to eliminate the cause of
the incident and generally improve our defenses. The IT Security
Office will also perform a deeper analysis of the compromise at this
point, which may include a forensic examination. Additional
remediation steps are employed as appropriate, such as changing
passwords and performing vulnerability assessments to validate our
desired security posture. If additional or new evidence is
discovered during this phase, it may be necessary to return to Step
2.
Step 5 – Recovery
During the recovery phase, affected services and systems are
restored to a functional and trusted state. Special care must be
taken during this step to not create, or reintroduce,
vulnerabilities that may facilitate another compromise. The
following additional actions may also be necessary, depending on the
nature of the incident: 1. Notification letters should be sent out
to individuals whose personally identifiable information may have
been compromised. 2. A frequently asked questions website for the
incident should be created. 3. An incident hotline should be created
and staffed.
Step 6 - Lessons Learned
Once the incident has passed, this phase becomes the most
important part of the incident response process. An incident report
should be generated by the IT Security Office, which will include
details of the incident, as well as the lessons learned in order to
preserve the knowledge. Once the report is complete, all
stakeholders should meet to discuss the findings, what went wrong,
and what could be done better in the future.
|
|